The best thing for my shop coming from the success of the new Batman movie (which, no, I haven't seen yet, although I've heard mostly rave reviews) is the trailer for the upcoming Watchmen movie. (annoying window-maximizing link)
I've watched the trailer at least a dozen times. And, no, that's not something I usually do. It's just amazing, and I can't wait for the movie.
When the trailer was released online, I dug out my old copy of the trade paperback of the collected Watchmen. I hadn't read the series in almost 20 years, and I know I didn't catch it all the first go-around. Re-reading it really made me appreciate Alan Moore and Dave Gibbons and their very integrated storytelling. For example, while I was reading it at the shop one day, a customer noticed, and she mentioned that she'd done some time as a letterer for comics in the pre-computer-lettering days, and that she had done a paper in college about the lettering in Watchmen.
Usually, lettering in a comic is a throwaway art. Once you have chosen the font and know the right proportions and placement of word balloons, it's fairly straightforward. However, there is no letterer noted for the Watchmen book, so I'd imagine that Gibbons lettered the book himself, which is unusual outside the world of self-publishing.
In Watchmen, there are several different fonts, indicating different facets to different characters. The word balloons, themselves, the woman said, seem to indicate the characters' loss of innocence. Golden-age (1940s) flashbacks have golden-age-style bulbous, multi-lobed, smooth word balloons. Early 1960s flashbacks have Silver-Age-style smooth word balloons, transitioning for certain characters, at key moments, into more angular balloons, made from many straight lines. Rorschach, one of the main characters, has very angular word balloons and a lettering font that's raspy and loose. His alter-ego, however, speaks softly and has only the usual angular balloons, like other characters with similar loss of innocence. There's a scene where he dons his mask, and you see the transition happen.
There's a lot to be said about the book. It's multi-layered in a way that only a comic book could be. The lettering and art contribute to the story as much as the words themselves. A story-within-a-story (a kid reading a grisly pirate comic at a newsstand), headlines on newspapers and background TV reports all lend plot elements and clues to the milieu. Time magazine named it as one of the 100 best novels of 1923-2000, and the book has sold millions of copies and stayed in print since its 1986 debut.
That said, the movie looks like it is going to live up to the source material in the same way that the new Batman movies live up to the darker Batman incarnations. This is really a great time for comics-based movies.
Ah -- so, my original point was that the trailer has been good for the shop. I ordered a dozen copies of the book when we sold out of the three we already had in stock on the day after Dark Knight opened. We sold that dozen copies within three days.
To put that in perspective, we have sold maybe 17 copies of "Y: The Last Man" volume 1, which was our previous bestseller, and something we recommend to everyone who asks for a recommendation. And that's since we opened in January. We've sold 15 copies of Watchmen in the past two weeks. Y is a $10 book, and Watchmen is a $20 book.
So, I've ordered another 20 copies to have in stock, since people still come in asking for it. Not to mention that, in the past two weeks, I've seen two different people on two different days sitting in the MIT Coop bookstore reading Watchmen.
If you haven't read the comic, go get it and read it now. It will take longer to read than most comics, as it is a lot denser, since it contains ancillary material, as well -- faux book excerpts, news articles, police reports, and other items.
One last thing, though: If you're already an experienced comic reader and have read things like "Fun Home" or "Maus," you may not think Watchmen is as amazing as many of us believe. It's kind of like a modern eye looking at "Citizen Kane" without the historical context. Yeah, so what? Camera angles, various storytelling devices and transitions -- all things that are commonplace in current movies. It's just important to note that Watchmen (or Citizen Kane) did it first, and sometimes best.
Watchmen will be out around March of next year. Before then, we have Will Eisner's Spirit and rumors about the upcoming Captain America movie to hold us over.
It's a good time to be a comic geek.
Comments
tHiS moVIe iz gUnNa roCk!
the production diaries are amazing. The website has all kinds of cool stuff on it. I check it out constantly. I know, its a complete and utter tease, but they are incredibly cool. I can't wait for this movie.
i love mi hub!
Y>NOT
Fact Checking Leads to Prepping For the Worst
As I told you guys in person, I'm prepared for the worst. Odds are it won't suck as badly as League or V for Vendetta. In fact, all the hype points to this being the most faithfully adapted Alan Moore adaptation to date.
The trailer, however, reveals a critical error. In the comic, Dan/Nite Owl is fat from nearly a decade of post-Keene Act inactivity. It's an important element in understanding the character. In contrast, the trailer's Nite Owl looks pretty buff. This error might seem small, but it exposes a misunderstanding of the story, and makes me wonder what other plot essentials were missed.
The casting is also suspect (the only age-appropriate actor is the guy playing Rorschach):
Character: Nite Owl 2/Daniel Dreiberg
Actor: Patrick Wilson (b. 1973)
Actor Age at Filming: 35
Character Age in Comic: 45 (approximate)
Character: The Comedian/Edward Morgan Blake
Actor: Jeffrey Dean Morgan (b. 1966)
Actor Age at Filming: 42
Character Age in Comic: 61
Character: Silk Specter 2/Laurie Juspeczyk
Actor: Malin Akerman (b. 1978)
Actor Age at Filming: 30
Character Age in Comic: 36
Character: Rorschach/Walter Joseph Kovacs
Actor: Jackie Earle Haley (b. 1961)
Actor Age at Filming: 47
Character Age in Comic: 45
Character: Ozymandias/Adrian Veidt
Actor: Matthew Goode (b. 1978)
Actor Age at Filming: 30
Character Age in Comic: 46
It's one thing when you cast with big name stars; it's another to cast actors you've never heard of and still get the aging wrong.
The costume alterations are a bit odd as well. (Ozymandias' nipples shows that we haven't learned a thing from Joel Schumacher). In the video 'blogs, the set and costume designers show more concern for "expressing themselves" than staying true to the graphic novel's intentions.
Having said that, of course I'm seeing the movie. Just with my guard up and hoping the non-comics fans will at least be entertained.
Sources:
Charcter Ages: The Annotated Watchmen
Actor Ages/Movie Stills: Internet Movie Database
David Marshall, Comic Book Artist
My Comics | My Email
Comic to Film, Film to Comic
You certainly have made some important observations about the film adaptation of Watchmen, but I think it is important to keep in mind the difference in mediums when making comparisons. The use of subtle detail Alan Moore and Dave Gibbons use in the comic to fully create that universe is stunning, and to translate one frame of that to film takes an incredible amount of energy and attention to detail. If you've ever worked on a film you know that at the end of the day you judge how well it went by the number of sacrifices you had to make, my point being that in the art of film, no matter the budget, things are going to go wrong and there are a lot of limitations.
In the art of comics however, it's almost exactly the opposite, with enough energy and talent you can create anything. The two mediums almost have to be judged on separate scales, apples to oranges. For example, I love both the novel and film V for Vendetta, but I feel that V for Vendetta is in my top list of graphic novels, and the movie is not in my top movies, but I enjoyed them both for what they are. Even though V for Vendetta in the world of movies is nowhere near as powerful and well made as V for Vendetta is in the world of comics, I still enjoyed them for what they are.
I think that with the limitations of film, Zack Synder is taking the source material and turning it into a great film. I know for a fact that the Watchmen film is not going to capture the full essence of the novel, but I do trust that all the creative talent that is going into making the film is doing as best as is possible to capture the original intent of Watchmen. To use the example you brought up about the ages of the characters and the actors playing them, when casting I think Zack Synder and his casting director were putting priority into acting ability, understanding the character, and love for the source material, etc as opposed to exact age and appearance, which can be manipulated with make-up and post-production.
Anyway, I think it's still incredibly important to be critical when examining films like this because with films limitations it's easy to make a bad movie, especially one as dense with important subtle details as Watchmen. And it's being critical and meticulous that creates great films, but I'd try not to judge the mediums so closely together, but instead more as stand-alone pieces. The only real way to tell is going to be when we see it! :)
Spencer C.
spencercampo@gmail.com
lettering
Hey,
How cool to see you discussing the lettering! I love it. It was indeed done by Gibbons himself, using one of those old-fashioned sticks with ink, what are they called? Oh yeah, pens.
JG